Try …​ Catch …​ Finally

Camel supports the Java equivalent of try .. catch and finally directly in the DSL. It aims to work like its Java sisters but with more power. Especially in Camel 2.0 where we gave this feature an overhaul.

In Camel we prefix the keywords with do to avoid having same keyword as Java. So we have:

  • doTry

  • doCatch

  • doFinally

  • end to end the block in Java DSL

Notice this document is based on how it works in Camel 2.0. In Camel 1.x this feature isn’t as powerful and it uses a slight different keyword names.

Camel error handling is disabled

When using doTry .. doCatch .. doFinally then the regular Camel Error Handler does not apply. That means any onException or the likes does not trigger. The reason is that doTry .. doCatch .. doFinally is in fact its own error handler and that it aims to mimic and work like how try/catch/finally works in Java.

About doCatch and its power over Java

The doCatch in Camel is empowered over its Java sister.

First of all you can define multiple exceptions to catch in a single block.

And second of all an important aspect over the regular Java counter parts is that Camel will check in the exception hierarchy when it matches a thrown exception against the doCatch blocks. The reasons is that many times the original caused exceptions is wrapped by other wrapper exceptions, typically transposing the exception from a checked to a runtime exception. Camel for instance does this by wrapped it in a RuntimeCamelException. So if the original caused exception is an java.io.IOException then Camel will still match a doCatch block defined with an java.io.IOException. And just like Java the order in which you have multiple doCatch blocks matter. Camel will iterate from the top going down and use the first doCatch that matches the exception. The reason is to keep it similar to the regular java and how it selects a catch block. This differers from the Exception Clause that has a more intelligent exception selection strategy among multiple onException definitions, where it also consider the delta in the exception hierarchy to select the best definition.

A third feature is that you can attach a onWhen predicate to signal if the catch should trigger or not at runtime.

And to simulate rethrowing an exception from a doCatch you should use the handled predicate. If its evaluated to false Camel will reattach the exception on the Exchange.

Using try .. catch .. finally in Java DSL

In the route below we have all keywords in action. As the code is based on a unit test we route using Mock.

TryProcessorMultipleExceptionTest.java

And in the route below we want to indicate if an IOException occured we want to route it elsewhere and at the same time keep the exception so the original caller is notified about this exception. To do this we need to not rethrow the exception and this is why we use handled and set it to false to indicate, no we did not handle it so please keep the exception. The 2nd exception block can be omitted but as the code is based on an unit test we want to test the behavior non IOException as well.

TryProcessorHandledTest.java

And finally we have an example of the onWhen predicate in action. We can attach it to a doCatch block and at runtime determine if the block should be triggered or not. In our case we only want to trigger if the caused exception message contains the damn word.

TryProcessorOnWhenTest.java

Use end() to end the block

Notice when using Java DSL we must use end() to indicate where the try .. catch .. finally block ends. As the example above has a finally, then the end() should be at the end of the finally block. If we are not using a finally, then the end() should be at the end of the doCatch to indicate the end there.

Using try .. catch .. finally in Spring DSL

We show the three sample samples using Spring DSL instead.

In the route below we have all keywords in action. As the code is based on a unit test we route using Mock.

SpringTryProcessorMultipleExceptionTest.xml

And in the route below we want to indicate if an IOException occured we want to route it elsewhere and at the same time keep the exception so the original caller is notified about this exception. To do this we need to not rethrow the exception and this is why we use handled and set it to false to indicate, no we did not handle it so please keep the exception. The 2nd exception block can be omitted but as the code is based on an unit test we want to test the behavior non IOException as well.

SpringTryProcessorHandledTest.xml

And finally we have an example of the onWhen predicate in action. We can attach it to a doCatch block and at runtime determine if the block should be triggered or not. In our case we only want to trigger if the caused exception message contains the damn word.

SpringTryProcessorOnWhenTest.xml

Back to top